Written By
STOP THE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM OF THE DUTCH GOVERNMENT TOWARDS ST MAARTEN
This statement has also been translated into Papiamentu and French below. Below, however is a television debate that we downloaded, transcribed and translated to English. So the English translation to video is posted below the video, the under that you can find out what they’re saying in English. Now we have to translate the latest from the French side. https://www.sxmgovernment.com
[aiovg_video mp4=”https://stmaartennews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/vid-20210410-wa0002-1.mp4″ poster=”https://stmaartennews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/20210506_095238-3.jpg”]
NTR/NPO T.V. Interview last night. It is not easy translating these glib, duplicitous, Dutch politicians.
INTRO TO VIDEO: The corona crisis has hit the economy of Sint Maarten hard. People, companies and the government are all generating very little income, because there is no tourism. After months of negotiating at the Binnenhof, Sint Maarten received millions in loans. Now State Secretary Knops has decided to temporarily halt the money supply from The Hague. Is this a good decision?
At the table: Sylvana Simons (Bij1) and André Bosman (VVD) https://www.npostart.nl/
TRANSLATION:
HOST OPENS: The corona pandemic has hit the St Maarten economy, the industry and the people in general very hard. There is little to no income being generated, because (of the pandemic) the tourists are staying away. At the same time for months St Maarten has been receiving millions in loans from the Netherlands, then this happened….
(NOS)BACKGROUND NARRATOR: “The State of St Maarten wants the United Nations to investigate claims of racism and human rights violations against the Dutch (Netherlands) government who they believe are behaving in a Neo-Colonial manner by using Corona assistance as a way to force reforms in St Maarten..”
FEMALE HOST TO KNOPS IN PRETAPED INTERVIEW: Were you surprised by this?
KNOPS: Yes, I was very surprised we are doing so much, so many loans therefore we would want some reform as conditions to go along with that. The St Maarten parliament are the best paid in the Kingdom as their people live in poverty. There has to be tax reforms, wage adjustments, yes the same conditions you would get from a bank in order to get a loan, that is what this is about better management, steering St Maarten in the right direction.
HOST: (Congratulates Simmons on seat in Parliament )
SYLVANA SIMONS: Thank you (They exchange pleasantries about the still in formation, Dutch Government )
HOST TURNS TO BOSMAN: Bosman has been in the Dutch Second Chamber / Parliament representing VVD for 11 years. “Do you think that it is a good idea to lend St Maarten money. Why do you think that’s a good idea?”
BOSMAN: If there is a crisis within the Kingdom, if it is critical there should be assistance. The Kingdom should be there for each other.
HOST: But under certain conditions…?
BOSMAN: Yes.
HOST: Which conditions? Why under specific conditions?
BOSMAN: There are four countries within the Kingdom, so if we are going to help each other, it should just be based on helping each other. But if there is money involved, then there must be conditions to help manage Aruba, Curaçao, in this instance Sint Maarten.
HOST: St Maarten is a developing country, it is not a municipality of the Netherlands like Bonaire. It is not completely independent, what exactly is it? For the first time I’m reading that it is not independent what exactly is it?
BOSMAN: It is a country within a Kingdom. Within that Kingdom there are four equal, autonomous countries.
Then you have Bonaire, Saba and Statia, they are special Dutch municipalities of the Netherlands, and we have a certain responsibility to them. But the Kingdom overrules the individual countries.
HOST TO SIMONS: St Maarten will run out of money in about a month How will that play out?
SIMONS BJI: We must not over simplify the complexities (of the issues) within the Kingdom. I still call the islands colonies because there is still that colonial vibe in the relationship between the Netherlands and the Dutch Caribbean islands. Holland in the relationship has Kingdom rule (the upper hand). I wonder why there are no representatives for example in the Tweede Kamer someone from the islands to directly speak for the islands. They say equal in theory, but in practice there isn’t any real equality.
HOST: So, that would be up to the Kingdom…?
SIMMONS: The Dutch Government, you can also say is the Kingdom Government…yes, no, maybe. It’s all about equality. That is the relevant word, equality. There are supposed to be four equal countries, that is the theory, but the practical reality is that The Netherlands still has hegemony over the Antilles. Holland is the biggest and strongest in the Kingdom. Holland has the power, is better managed. So you cannot call the relationship equal. I know very well that these people (Antillians) are not physically in the chambers every day, but there should be ways that they can also be represented in the chambers.
(HOST STEERS SIMONS TOWARDS THE TOPIC OF SINT MAARTEN)
SIMONS: The ‘St Maarten Question’ , and Mr Bosman knows better than I… The Netherlands and Sint Maarten cannot be compared side by side, there is historical context. It is normal, for a small municipality to try to take bit of control, to empower itself. Everyone plays their role within the Kingdom.
HOST TO SIMONS: About the financing what is wrong with conditions?
SIMONS: There is nothing wrong with adding conditions to a loan. And yes, loans need conditions. If I loaned you money, there would be repayment conditions, well maybe not you (joke) It has to do with the timing, and what exactly the conditions are. As soon as there is a crisis, then conditions take on a different meaning. Conditions applied under regular times are different than when there are crises e.g. conditions applied during a hurricane or a pandemic
HOST TO SIMMONS: Do you believe that the Corona crisis was used as a weapon to make St Maarten more pliable to newly imposed Dutch reform?
SIMONS: Now Mr Bosman can better explain these conditions better than I can, and he can explain when these conditions caused a fracture in the relationships between the governments within the Kingdom. I have yet to attend my first meeting on Kingdom Relations. What I do know is that crises should not be used as a way to coerce others into abiding by forced conditions. It was used to coerce, force turn the screws on islands under pressure. (They) had no room to manouevre / negotiate.
HOST TO BOSMAN: Now one of the conditions that the islands have issues with is COHO. A tool implemented by the Netherlands to assist in reformation and development of the CAS islands. The Financial assistance given to Sint Maarten after Hurricane Irma in 2017, already came with strict conditions that tightened the noose around Sint Maarten. Now with COHO, the conditions are even stricter, so there are complaints about the conditions being too austere. Lowering of pensions, salary cuts, new taxes…
BOSMAN: It’s logical, it is a small country in the middle of a crisis, where just a few are enriching themselves. (Former Government Leader) Theo Heyliger is on his way to prison, and has to pay back $17million dollars, they were running things, it is worrisome. So It’s more than the Netherlands sending money to Sint Maarten, it’s about the money reaching the people that it is meant for.
HOST TURNS TO SIMONS: Does that sound reasonable?
SIMONS: Yes, It does all sound very reasonable, but the fact remains, left leaning or right leaning it is the people who are getting the short end of the stick.
BOSMAN: (Nods in agreement)
SIMONS: That is what really irks me the most. If you tie a knot too tight, it will be difficult to unravel.
HOST: What’s wrong with the conditions that were suggested…
SIMONS: Nothing is wrong if it’s just about better governance. You say you want better management, you want to work on getting rid of corruption, you want the country running as a working democracy.
But the factual reality is, the island (Sint Maarten) was hit by a terrible natural disaster, then the pandemic comes along and all income dries up, because there is no tourism. Yes, there needs to be conditions, but you have to ask yourself if this is the time, if this is the place to impose these conditions? You could also say this (misfortune) could be used as a new means to assist, we can send people. Defense is always ready to assist. So we can ensure that as we are assisting as we integrate reforms. Reforms won’t happen in a week. The process will be ongoing. You have the complicated relationship between St Maarten and The Netherlands, but in the mean time hungry people in St Maarten will be going without food or assistance.
HOST TO SIMONS: The reforms are a sensitive issue, (Sint Maarten) Rolando and Grisha retained an American attorney and accused The Netherlands of racism, filing a complaint with the United Nations. And then Holland’s response was to tighten the screws. You call it ‘a ‘colonial’ reaction to a complaint about Colonial ways’. Big words
SIMONS: Yes, let it be said… we can say that we are rid of colonialism, but that is simply not so. It is not fact. It is not normal for a Kingdom to have ‘countries,’ on the other side of the world, that they were linked with in colonial historical context. There has always been a colonial element and certainly a colonial feel to the relationship.
HOST: Asks Bosman something unintelligable…
BOSMAN: Yes, Ms Simons is talking about what she ‘feels,’ but basically, this is about appointments. Not letter appointment, appointments made by Parliament. Reforms, already signed off on, that Parliament already agreed to. Then later we receive a letter. Then they are saying “But, we don’t want reforms, just the money”. So then the State Secretary (Knops) asks, do you want reforms, or not?
HOST:
BOSMAN: The problems were there before Corona, it is a years long, ongoing problem. For ten years I’ve been in (political office), there has always been financial mismanagement. My Parliament colleague, Ronald Van Raak and I ensured an investigation. These people, Schotte,Theo went/are going to prison. They are/were enriching themselves at the (expense of the common man). So as Holland is sending the money they have to oversee the management of it. There has been a lot of criticism, if you want the money you need to enact the reforms. It is a choice. They don’t are not obliged to (accept money/conditions) .
SIMONS: Then you have to question whether there really aren four equal countries. With loans there is interest there are conditions. You can ask the question… Does one country have the right to oversee the reforms of another country.. can they impose demands? If a country says, we need help, you can oversee the loan, yes, but does it give you the right to enact and control reforms as a part of the conditions(to the loan)? You can control where the funding money is going, yes. But the presumption by the Netherlands, although with good intentions is that, yes we are loaning money and as a condition for accepting the loan, you will abide by our reform conditions. There has to be a question mark…
HOST: Every year in the Second Chamber there are debates about the islands. Look at this footage from 2019
CHRIS VAN DAM (CDA) ASKS BOSMAN IN 2019: There are new generations in the islands that want something different, what will the VVD’s story be, to abandon them?
BOSMAN RESPONDS TO VAN DAM: It’s a bit ‘colonial thinking’, and that’s the past. We have to give people the power. There has to be solutions to the problems on the islands, and the ones responsible for those solutions are the islands. It’s the same as giving an alcoholic liquor.
VAN DAM: If Mr Bosman is going to compare our compatriot islands to alcoholics, I am ending my argument here.
HOST TO BOSMAN: In 2019 you compared the islands’ to alcoholics.
BOSMAN: You ended the clip too early, because in my reaction, I let it be known that it was figurative speech. If you are unable to stop, if there is no cut off point, you will always be taking a hand out. Research has shown…
HOST (interrupts): To compare assistance to alcoholism is so painful, whether the video clip is short or not..
BOSMAN: But if you are holding on to colonialism, to the past where you are getting handouts. Independence. And if you are talking about the future of a country like St Maarten that’s calling it colonialism, if you take the steps in developing your own identity, own country own choice.
HOST: So independence from colonialism?
BOSMAN: Then the moneystream has to stop. There is enough money in St Maarten, I’m convinced. We are talking about the cost of the de-colonization, that they themselves want
HOST: I don’t get it, So where is this money?
BOSMAN: In hotels, casinos, the harbor, unpaid taxes. Curacao is still owed, one billion in taxes in just the past ten years. They would NEVER have to ask for money if they were collecting taxes…
SIMONS: It irks me that it is all a bit true. I agree a time should be set aside for full de-colonization, it has to do with infrastructure, and a whole lot of other factors, also about defense. A lot of different things. What got me, was the timing. The moment that they(the CAS Islands) were down, Holland really put the screws in them.
HOST: Time is up, this should be an interesting topic for the new cabinet.
OTHER COVERAGE:
THE HAGUE – The Dutch political party BIJ1 supports the petition of St. Maarten accusing the Netherlands of colonialism and racism. This is stated in a statement that BIJ1 published today on their website.
The statement of BIJ1 proves St. Maarten right: the relationship between the Netherlands and the Caribbean islands is allegedly based on institutional racism. BIJ1 cites various examples of racism in the Netherlands. For example Zwarte Piet, the benefits affair and discrimination in schools, the workplace, and the job market.
BIJ1 agrees with the Parliament of Sint Maarten that the United Nations (UN) is obliged to assist the islanders and all other victims of institutional racism within the Kingdom.
The political party calls on the Dutch government to resume liquidity support. In addition, BIJ1 wants the Netherlands to cooperate with international organizations such as the UN and St. Maarten for “a society without racism.”
STOP THE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM OF THE DUTCH GOVERNMENT TOWARDS ST. MAARTEN
This statement has also been translated into Papiamentu and French below.
We the undersigned agree fully with the parliament of St. Maarten and its appeal to the UN regarding institutional racism in the state and kingdom of the Netherlands. Tying emergency aid to far reaching external oversight and the shrinking of internal autonomy flies in the face of the Kingdom Charter and UN conventions. These actions do not center the interests of the inhabitants of the island but use their dire situation in a game of chicken to regain control.
We recognize as Dutch citizens, civil society organizers, public representatives, religious leaders, trade union activists and artists that racism is indeed a major problem in Dutch society and within all layers of the Dutch government. It is proven time after time that the current government of the Netherlands is unable and unwilling to address this problem. We’re demanding that the coming cabinet ensures that the relationship between St. Maarten and the Netherland is one based on equality.
We point to the many racism scandals in the police force which resulted time and time again in the toxic environment for officers of color and the ousting of whistleblowers and never in the firing of racist police officers. We point to the so called “toeslagaffaire” where racism played a major role and where criminal justice was denied from the victims with the a flimsy excuse.
We point to the many Dutch traditions that still include racist symbols, often caricatures of black people (Zwarte Piet) names of dishes, the paintings on the Kings Golden Carriage depicting the enslavement of black people as a triumph and more. We point to the many publications in Dutch media that encourage hate of Muslims including in Dutch public media (NPO) and private outlets.
We point to the fact that there has been a lack of a meaningful institutional response to the rise of anti-Asian hate since the outbreak of the pandemic. And that anti-Asian hate is normalized through children’s songs in child day care, the sexual fetishization of the Asian community and the ways in which they are presented as the model minority which obscures their struggles.
We point to the fact Black people suffer from discrimination in the education system, in the justice system, in the housing market and the job market. We point to the fact that the government of the Netherlands is not doing any substantial moves to end this and in many cases doesn’t even recognize such discrimination as a problem.
We point to the fact the Dutch parliament now has 3 parties where hate towards the Muslim community is a fundamental part of their political message. 3 political parties that openly aim to discriminate against Muslims in various ways including the call to expel people of North African origin that was made public by the leader of the third largest party in parliament.
We point to the fact that antisemitic chants are widely seen by political leaders and police officers as protected under freedom of speech and a legitimate part of football culture and far right demonstrations.
We point to the fact that legislation limiting the rights of traveller communities are rooted in unacknowledge anti-Roma and Sinti sentiment that continues to other them in Dutch society and culture at large. The existence of these communities are presented as problems that need to be solved instead of the poverty in these communities and the structural barriers that they encounter simply living their lives.
We conclude that the parliament of St. Maarten is correct to point to the fact that institutional racism is at the base of the relationship between the government of the Netherlands and Caribbean islands under its direct control or within the Dutch kingdom.
We agree with the parliament of St. Maarten that the UN has a duty to assist citizens of these islands and others who suffer from institutional racism within the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
We call upon the government of the Netherlands to work together with different international organizations including the UN and with the government of St. Maarten towards a society free of racism.
We call upon the government of the Netherlands to unfreeze funds intended for St. Maarten that are now being denied from the people of St. Maarten as a tool of extortion.
—–
STÒP RASISMO INSTITUSHONAL DI GOBIÈRNU HULANDES PA KU ST. MAARTEN.
Pa medio di esaki firmantenan ta deklará di ta kompletamente di akuerdo ku parlamento di St.Maarten i su apelashon na Nashonnan Uní kontra rasismo institushonal den estado i reino hulandes. Mara ayudo di emergencia na supervishon eksterno i redukshon di outonomia interno ta un bòftá den kara di statuto di reino i palabrashonnan di Nashonnan Uní. E akshonnan aki no tin interes di habitantenan di e islanan na kurason pero ta mal usá e situashon aktual di e islanan pa hunga un wega di dos baraha ku intenshon di rekuperá poder.
Nos komo suidadano hulandes, organisadónan di sosiedat sivil, representantenan públiko, lidernan religioso, aktivistanan sindikal i artistanan ta rekonosé ku realmente rasismo ta un problema mayó den sosiedat hulandes i den tur gremio di e gobièrnu di Hulanda. A komprobá diferente biaha ku e gobièrnu aktual di Hulanda ta inkapas i no ta dispuesto pa atendé e problema aki. Nos ta eksigí pa e siguiente gabinete garantisá ku e relashon entre St. Maarten i Hulanda ta basá riba igualdat.
Nos ta señalá diferente skandal di rasismo denter di kuerpo polisial ku a resultá na mayoria okashon den un ambiente toksiko pa e agentenan di kolo i ekspulshon di e denunsiantenan pero nunka retiro di e agentenan polisial rasista. Nos ta señalá riba e víktimanan di e asina yamá “toeslagaffaire” den kual rasismo a hunga un ròl mayó, víktimanan ku te dia di awe no a risibí hustisia bou di un èksküs debil.
Nos ta señalá diferente tradishon hulandes ku ainda ta inkluí símbolonan rasista, regularmente karikaturanan di hende pretu (Zwarte Piet), pinturanan riba e karosa real di oro ku ta representá sklabitut di hende pretu komo un triunfo i mas. Nos ta señalá vários publikashon den medionan di komunikashon hulandes ku ta fomentá islamofobia inkluso medionan públiko hulandes (NPO) i medionan privá.
Nos ta señalá e echo ku tin falta di atenshon i un reakshon institushonal riba e oumento di sintimentu di odio kontra komunidat asiatiko desde e pandemia di COVID-19. Ta normalisándo odio asiatiko pa medio di kantikanan pa mucha den krèshnan, seksualisashon di e komunidat asiatiko i tambe e maneranan ku nan ta presentá komo un minoridat ehemplar kual ta kontribuí na minimalisashon di e komunidat asiátiko su lucha.
Nos ta señalá ku hende pretu ta sufri di diskriminashon den e sistema di edukashon, e sistema hudisial, den e merkado di bibienda i merkado laboral. Nos ta señalá e echo ku gobièrnu hulandes no ta hasiendo sufisiente den e area aki i hopi biaha no ta ni rekonosé ku diskriminashon ta un problema.
Nos ta señalá ku parlamento hulandes tin 3 partido di kual islamofobia ta un parti fundamental di nan mensahe polítiko. 3 partido polítiko ku públikamente ta diskriminá komunidat mòslem den varios forma, inkluyendo e yamada di e lider polítiko di e di tres partido mas grandi den parlamento hulandes pa ekspulsá personanan di origen nort afrikano.
Nos ta señalá ku ekspreshonnan antisemita ta deskartá pa lidernan polítiko i agentenan polisial bou di e èksküs ku esaki ta protehá pa e derecho di libertat di ekspreshon.
Alabes nos ta señalá ku e sintimentunan aki ta un parti legítimo di e kultura den futbòl i manifestashonnan di partidonan derecho ekstremo riba tereno polítiko.
Nos ta señalá ku legislashon limitando derechonan di komunidat biahero ta ankrá den un sintimentu di anti-Roma i anti-Sinti. E sintimentu aki kontinuamente ta klasifiká komunidat Roma i Sinti komo otro den sosiedat i kultura hulandes. Enbes ku e enfoke ta riba e pobresa den e komunidatnan aki i e bareranan struktural ku nan ta enkontrá bibando nan bida. E enfoke ta riba e simpel echo ku e komunidatnan aki ta eksistí. Nan eksistensia ta mirá komo un problema ku mester di solushon.
Nos ta konkluí ku e parlamento di St. Maarten ta korekto den señalá e echo ku rasismo institushonal ta na e base di e relashon entre e gobièrnu Hulanda i e islanan karibense bou di kontrol direkto of den reino hulandes.
Nos ta di akuerdo ku parlamento di Sint Maarten ku Nashonnan Uní tin e deber pa yuda suidadonan di e islanan aki ku ta sufri di rasismo institushonal den reino hulandes.
Nos ta urgi gobièrnu hulandes pa kolaborá ku e diferente organisashonnan internashonal, inkluyendo Nashonnan Uní i parlamento di Sint Maarten pa realisá un sosiedat liber di rasismo.
Nos ta urgi gobièrnu hulandes pa liberá e fondonan destiná pa St. Maarten ku awor ta usa komo un método di ekstorshon.
—–
HALTE AU RACISME INSTITUTIONNEL DU GOUVERNEMENT NÉERLANDAIS ENVERS L’ÎLE DE SAINT-MARTIN.
L’ensemble des personnes signataires de la présente lettre sont en accord complet avec le Parlement de Saint-Martin, et de son appel auprès de l’ONU au sujet du racisme institutionnel du Royaume des Pays-Bas. L’association des aides d’urgence à un contrôle externe très soutenu et la réduction des autonomies internes de l’île s’oppose au Statut du Royaume des Pays-Bas et aux conventions de l’ONU. Ces décisions ne mettent pas en avant les intérêts des habitants de l’île, et instrumentalisent la situation critique de l’île dans un bras de fer qui a pour objectif de regagner un contrôle de l’île.
En tant que citoyens néerlandais, organisateurs dans la société civile, représentants du public, leaders religieux, syndicalistes et artistes, nous prenons acte du problème majeur que le racisme constitue dans la société néerlandaise, et à tous les niveaux du gouvernement néerlandais. À maintes reprises, le gouvernement des Pays Bas a prouvé son incapacité et sa réticence à adresser ce problème. Nous demandons que le prochain cabinet de gouvernement s’assure que la relation entre Saint-Martin et les Pays-Bas se base sur un principe d’égalité.
Maintes fois, des scandales de racisme au sein de la police ont créé un environnement toxique pour les officiers racisés, dans lequel les lanceurs d’alertes sont licenciés mais pas les policiers incriminés. Nous soulignons que le racisme a joué un rôle majeur dans la “toeslagaffaire”, dont les victimes ont fait face à un déni de justice sous des prétextes fallacieux.
Nous soulignons le nombre important de traditions néerlandaises comportant des symboles racistes: la caricature des personnes noires (Zwarte Piet), le nom de certains plats typiques, les panneaux peint sur le Chariot d’Or du Roi qui représentent la traite des noirs comme un triomphe du Royaume, et bien d’autres. Les publications dans les médias néerlandais qui encouragent la haine des Musulmans sont nombreuses, par exemple le média public néerlandais (NPO) mais aussi dans les médias privés.
Nous soulignons l’absence, au niveau institutionnel, de réponse significative face à la montée de la haine envers les Asiatiques depuis le début de la pandémie. La haine anti-asiatique est normalisée par les comptines dans les crèches, la fétichisation sexuelle de la communauté asiatique, et la présentation de cette communauté en tant que minorité modèle, qui obscurcit les difficultés que ses membres rencontrent.
Nous soulignons la discrimination que les personnes noires rencontrent dans l’éducation, la justice, l’immobilier et la recherche d’emploi. Nous soulignons le fait que le gouvernement néerlandais n’a pas pris de mesures importantes pour mettre fin à ces formes de discrimination, et ne reconnait pas l’existence de discrimination en temps que problème.
Nous soulignons le fait que le Parlement néerlandais a désormais trois partis qui considèrent la haine envers la communauté musulmane en tant que partie intégrale de leur message politique. Trois partis qui se donnent ouvertement l’objectif d’implémenter des discriminations envers la population musulmane, notamment par un appel à l’expulsion des personnes d’origine maghrébine, rendu public par le leader du troisième plus grand parti au sein du Parlement.
Nous soulignons que des chants antisémites, chantés sous les yeux de personnalités politiques et officiers de police, sont protégés par la liberté d’expression et constituent une part légitime de la culture footballistique et des manifestations d’extrême droite.
Nous soulignons le fait que la législation limitant les droits des gens du voyage trouve son fondement dans un sentiment anti-Rom et anti-Sinti non avoué, qui continue l’ostracisation de ces communautés dans la société et la culture néerlandaise. L’existence de ces communautés est présentée en temps qu’un problème à résoudre, au lieu de s’attaquer au problème de la pauvreté et des barrières institutionnelles que les membres de cette communauté rencontrent dans leur vie de tous les jours.
Nous concluons que le Parlement de Saint-Martin est correct quand il pointe du doigt le racisme institutionnel qui est à la base de la relation entre le gouvernement des Pays Bas et les îles caribéennes qui sont sous le contrôle direct ou sous la tutelle du gouvernement néerlandais.
Nous sommes en accord avec le Parlement de Saint-Martin sur le devoir de l’ONU d’apporter son assistance aux citoyens de ces îles et à toute autre communauté sujette au racisme institutionnel du Royaume des Pays-Bas.
Nous appelons le gouvernement néerlandais à travailler avec des organisations internationales, dont l’ONU et le gouvernement de l’île de Saint-Martin, pour créer une société exempte de racisme.
Nous appelons le gouvernement néerlandais à débloquer les fonds destinés à Saint-Martin, dont le présent refus est un outil d’extorsion.
https://bij1.org/stop-the-institutional-racism-of-the-dutch-government-towards-st-maarten/
Contents
Related News
